4.5 Review

GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology

期刊

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 236-263

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1195

关键词

mixed-treatment comparison; multiple-treatment meta-analysis; indirect treatment comparison; comparing multiple interventions

资金

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking [115546]
  2. European Union
  3. EFPIA companies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pairwise meta-analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific interventions. The usefulness of pairwise meta-analysis is thus limited in real-life medical practice, where many competing interventions may be available for a certain condition and studies informing some of the pairwise comparisons may be lacking. This commonly encountered scenario has led to the development of network meta-analysis (NMA). In the last decade, several applications, methodological developments, and empirical studies in NMA have been published, and the area is thriving as its relevance to public health is increasingly recognized. This article presents a review of the relevant literature on NMA methodology aiming to pinpoint the developments that have appeared in the field. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据