4.1 Article

Frequency ratios of Sr, Yb, and Hg based optical lattice clocks and their applications

期刊

COMPTES RENDUS PHYSIQUE
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 489-498

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crhy.2015.04.003

关键词

Time and frequency metrology; Atomic clock; Optical lattice clock; Constancy of fundamental constants; Relativistic geodesy

资金

  1. FIRST Program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Photon Frontier Network Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes the recent progress of optical lattice clocks with neutral strontium (Sr-87), ytterbium (Yb-171) and mercury (Hg-199) atoms. In particular, we present frequency comparison between the clocks locally via an optical frequency comb and between two Sr clocks at remote sites using a phase-stabilized fibre link. We first review cryogenic Sr optical lattice clocks that reduce the room-temperature blackbody radiation shift by two orders of magnitude and serve as a reference in the following clock comparisons. Similar physical properties of Sr and Yb atoms, such as transition wavelengths and vapour pressure, have allowed our development of a compatible clock for both species. A cryogenic Yb clock is evaluated by referencing a Sr clock. We also report on an Hg clock, which shows one order of magnitude less sensitivity to blackbody radiation, while its large nuclear charge makes the clock sensitive to the variation of fine-structure constant. Connecting all three types of clocks by an optical frequency comb, the ratios of the clock frequencies are determined with uncertainties smaller than possible through absolute frequency measurements. Finally, we describe a synchronous frequency comparison between two Sr-based remote clocks over a distance of 15 km between RIKEN and the University of Tokyo, as a step towards relativistic geodesy. (C) 2015 Academie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据