3.8 Proceedings Paper

Structural and morphological properties of pristine and Zn doped CdO nanoparticles for thermoelectric applications

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 664-668

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.369

关键词

Chemical Precipitation method; Seebeck Coefficient; Thermoelectric power factor; Figure of merit; Nanostructuring; Chemical Precipitation method; Seebeck Coefficient; Thermoelectric power factor; Figure of merit; Nanostructuring

资金

  1. DST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the Chemical Precipitation method was used to synthesize Zn doped CdO nanoparticles, and their structures and morphologies were characterized by X-ray diffraction and FESEM. The results showed that the prepared nanoparticles had a face centred cubic structure, and the nanostructure was expected to enhance the thermoelectric performance, making it efficient for thermoelectric applications.
The Chemical Precipitation method was adopted to synthesize Pristine CdO and Zn doped CdO Nanoparticles with 2% Zn Concentration for thermoelectric applications. The crystal structure of the synthesized nanoparticles was investigated by X-ray diffraction at room temperature. Rietveld Refinement technique was used to evaluate the detailed structural parameters from X-Ray Diffraction data which confirmed the face centred cubic structure of the prepared material with space group Fm 3 m. The FESEM images confirmed the presence of nanoparticles with irregular shapes. EDX analysis confirmed the presence of constituent elements in the prepared materials. Since Nanostructuring results in increment in power factor and reduction in thermal conductivity so the figure of merit is expected to increase. Thus the prepared material is efficient for thermoelectric applications.(c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials Science and Mathematics for Advanced Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据