4.6 Article

Optimization of cis-9-Heptadecenoic Acid Production from the Oleaginous Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica

期刊

FERMENTATION-BASEL
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8060245

关键词

Y; lipolytica; fermentation; odd-chain fatty acids; cis-9-heptadecenoic acid; central composite design

资金

  1. ANR grant of the French National Research Agency (ANR) in France [ANR-20-CE43-0007]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-20-CE43-0007] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the production of odd-chain fatty acid-enriched lipids through fermentation using a genetically engineered strain. The optimal conditions for maximizing cell density and fatty acid content were determined, and the results show potential for industrial production.
Odd-chain fatty acids (OCFA) have been studied for their therapeutic and nutritional properties, as well as for their potential use in the chemical industry for the production of biofuel. Genetic modification strategies have demonstrated an improved production of OCFA by oleaginous microorganisms. In this study, the production of OCFA-enriched lipids by fermentation using a genetically engineered Yarrowia lipolytica strain was investigated. The major fatty acid produced by this strain was the cis-9-heptadecenoic acid (C17:1). Its biosynthesis was optimized using a design of experiment strategy involving a central composite design. The optimal responses maximizing the cell density (optical density at 600 nm) and the C17:1 content (%) in lipids were found using 52.4 g/L sucrose, 26.9 g/L glycerol, 10.4 g/L sodium acetate, 5 g/L sodium propionate, and 4 g/L yeast extract. Under these conditions, in a 5 L scale bioreactor, the respective contents of lipids and C17:1 in culture medium were 2.52 +/- 0.05 and 0.82 +/- 0.01 g/L after 96 h fermentation. The results obtained in this work pave the way toward the process upscale of C17:1 and encourage its industrial production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据