4.2 Article

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to infection prevention and control measures between 2019 and 2021 in Swiss sentinel private practices: repeated cross-sectional surveys

期刊

SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

E M H SWISS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS LTD
DOI: 10.4414/SMW.2022.w30170

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in adherence to infection prevention and control measures in private practices, including improved mask wearing and hand hygiene, as well as better management of symptomatic patients and enhanced ventilation and cleaning.
AIMS OF THE STUDY: The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the importance of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in health care settings, including primary care. We aimed to describe how it influenced adherence to infection prevention and control measures in private practices in the Swiss sentinel network (Sentinella). METHOD: An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the 181 Sentinella practices in 2021 that included questions on the practice's spatial organisation, staff habits and vaccination coverage, ventilation, mask wearing, hand hygiene, as well as triage and separation of patients with suspected infection. Results were compared with those of a 2019 survey conducted in the same setting. RESULTS: We received 127 valid questionnaires (70.2% response rate). At the time of the study, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was underway among physicians (51.3%). Between 2019 and 2021, an absence of specific recommendations on mask wearing for staff (55.7%) changed into a recommendation for continuous wearing (93.7%); hand hygiene improved, especially upon arrival at the practice (63.9% vs 85.8%; p <0.001) and before examining patients (74.6% vs 88.2%; p <0.010); impossibility of distancing symptomatic patients dropped (27.9% vs 3.9%, p <0.001); and ventilation and cleaning improved (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic led to important changes in adherence to the recommended IPC measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据