3.8 Proceedings Paper

Long Short-Term Temporal Meta-learning in Online Recommendation

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3488560.3498371

关键词

recommendation; temporal meta-learning; online recommendation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a Long Short-Term Temporal Meta-learning framework (LSTTM) for online recommendation, which captures users' preferences through a global long-term graph and an internal short-term graph. It uses different aggregators and training strategies to learn user long-term and short-term preferences separately. Additionally, the article introduces a temporal meta-learning method based on MAML for fast adaptation to users' real-time interests.
An effective online recommendation system should jointly capture users' long-term and short-term preferences in both users' internal behaviors (from the target recommendation task) and external behaviors (from other tasks). However, it is extremely challenging to conduct fast adaptations to real-time new trends while making full use of all historical behaviors in large-scale systems, due to the real-world limitations in real-time training efficiency and external behavior acquisition. To address these practical challenges, we propose a novel Long Short-Term Temporal Meta-learning framework (LSTTM) for online recommendation. It arranges user multi-source behaviors in a global long-term graph and an internal short-term graph, and conducts different GAT-based aggregators and training strategies to learn user short-term and long-term preferences separately. To timely capture users' real-time interests, we propose a temporal meta-learning method based on MAML under an asynchronous optimization strategy for fast adaptation, which regards recommendations at different time periods as different tasks. In experiments, LSTTM achieves significant improvements on both offline and online evaluations. It has been deployed on a widelyused online recommendation system named WeChat Top Stories, affecting millions of users.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据