4.2 Article

Resonant enhancement of three-body loss between strongly interacting photons

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L022059

关键词

-

资金

  1. ARL CDQI
  2. AFOSR
  3. ARO MURI
  4. DoE ASCR Quantum Testbed Pathfinder program [DE-SC0019040]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0019449]
  6. DoE ASCR Accelerated Research in Quan-tum Computing program [DE-SC0020312]
  7. NSF PFCQC program
  8. DARPA SAVaNT ADVENT
  9. NSF PFC at JQI
  10. Foundation for Polish Science
  11. European Union under the European Re-gional Development Fund
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [681208]
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [681208] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that three-body interactions in Rydberg polaritons may result in stronger forces in dissipative states, an area that still requires further exploration. By applying renormalization group techniques, the shape and strength of dissipative three-body forces can be enhanced, and these interactions can be related to single-mode cavity transmission.
Rydberg polaritons provide an example of a rare type of system where three-body interactions can be as strong as or even stronger than two-body interactions. The three-body interactions can be either dispersive or dissipative, with both types possibly giving rise to exotic, strongly interacting, and topological phases of matter. Despite past theoretical and experimental studies of the regime with dispersive interaction, the dissipative regime is still mostly unexplored. Using a renormalization group technique to solve the quantum three-body problem, we show how the shape and strength of dissipative three-body forces can be universally enhanced for Rydberg polaritons. We demonstrate how these interactions relate to the transmission through a single-mode cavity, which can be used as a probe of the three-body physics in current experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据