4.1 Article

Safety and immunogenicity of the Pfizer/BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA third booster vaccine dose the BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron variants

期刊

MED
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 406-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.04.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. AMED [JP21fk0108104, JP21mk0102146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dose vaccination against the Omicron variant is effective in boosting neutralization against this variant.
Background: The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in Japan in November 2021. This variant contains up to 36 mutations in the spike protein, the target of neutralizing antibodies, and can escape vaccine-induced immunity. A booster vaccination campaign began with healthcare workers and high-risk groups. The safety and immunogenicity of the three-dose vaccination against Omicron remain unknown. Methods: A total of 272 healthcare workers were initially evaluated for long-term vaccine safety and immunogenicity. We further established a vaccinee panel to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity against variants of concern (VOCs), including the Omicron variants, using a live virus microneutralization assay. Findings: Two-dose vaccination induced robust anti-spike antibodies and neutralization titers (NTs) against the ancestral strain WK-521, whereas NTs against VOCs were significantly lower. Within 93- 247 days of the second vaccine dose, NTs against Omicron were completely abolished in up to 80% of individuals in the vaccinee panel. Booster dose induced a robust increase in anti-spike antibodies and NTs against the WK-521, Delta, and Omicron variants. There were no significant differences in the neutralization ability of sera from boosted individuals among the Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2. Boosting increased the breadth of humoral immunity and cross -reactivity with Omicron without changes in cytokine signatures and adverse event rate. Conclusions: The third vaccination dose is safe and increases neutralization Omicron variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据