4.8 Article

Antibiotic-Like Activity of Atomic Layer Boron Nitride for Combating Resistant Bacteria

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 7674-7688

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c11353

关键词

2D materials; nanotoxicity; proteomics; molecular dynamic simulation; antimicrobial resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science of Foundation of China [21976126]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0710700, 2021YFA1302601]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20211545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the antibiotic-like activity of two-dimensional boron nitride nanosheets against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) bacteria, along with excellent biocompatibility in mammals. These nanosheets can inhibit bacterial growth by targeting key surface proteins involved in cell division and exhibit potent antibacterial effects in a lung infection model.
The global rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) that increasingly invalidates conventional antibiotics has become a huge threat to human health. Although nanosized antibacterial agents have been extensively explored, they cannot sufficiently discriminate between microbes and mammals, which necessitates the exploration of other antibiotic-like candidates for clinical uses. Herein, two-dimensional boron nitride (BN) nanosheets are reported to exhibit antibiotic-like activity to AMR bacteria. Interestingly, BN nanosheets had AMR-independent antibacterial activity without triggering secondary resistance in long-term use and displayed excellent biocompatibility in mammals. They could target key surface proteins (e.g., FtsP, EnvC, ToIB) in cell division, resulting in impairment of Z-ring constriction for inhibition of bacteria growth. Notably, BN nanosheets had potent antibacterial effects in a lung infection model by P. aeruginosa (AMR), displaying a 2-fold increment of survival rate. Overall, these results suggested that BN nanosheets could be a promising nano-antibiotic to combat resistant bacteria and prevent AMR evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据