4.6 Article

Decision-Based Attack to Speaker Recognition System via Local Low-Frequency Perturbation

期刊

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 1432-1436

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2022.3183538

关键词

Perturbation methods; Distortion; Speaker recognition; Computational modeling; Signal processing algorithms; Task analysis; Time-domain analysis; Adversarial example; decision-based attack; speaker recognition system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [6217011361, 61901237]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LY20F020010]
  3. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation [202003N4089]
  4. Alibaba Innovative Research Program
  5. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter proposes a two-step query-efficient decision-based attack based on local low-frequency perturbation for speaker recognition systems, which achieves a higher attacking success rate.
Despite neural network-based speaker recognition systems (SRS) have enjoyed significant success, they are proved to be quite vulnerable to adversarial examples. In practice, the SRS model parameters are not always available. Attackers have to probe the model only via querying, and such decision-based attacking merely relies on the output label is quite challenging. This letter proposes a two-step query-efficient decision-based attack based on local low-frequency perturbation. Specifically, instead of imposing perturbation on the entire audio sample, a local attacking region is firstly sought, confining the perturbed distortion to a local region. Second, considering that the majority of energy concentrates on the low-frequency bands, the proposed method suggests performing perturbation generation in the low-frequency domain. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with the recent methods, our method could implement target attacking to SRS with a higher attacking success rate, at the cost of much lower queries and adversarial perturbation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据