4.6 Article

Efficacy of antineoplastic treatment is associated with the use of antibiotics that modulate intestinal microbiota

期刊

ONCOIMMUNOLOGY
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1150399

关键词

Antibiotics; chemotherapy; cisplatin; cyclophosphamide; microbiota

资金

  1. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  2. Astellas
  3. Gilead Sciences
  4. Infectopharm
  5. Pfizer
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Roche
  8. Mundipharma
  9. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche
  10. Janssen-Cilag
  11. Astellas Pharma
  12. MSD
  13. Amgen
  14. Takeda
  15. Mologen
  16. German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) [01KN1106]
  17. European Commission
  18. 3M
  19. Actelion
  20. AstraZeneca
  21. Basilea
  22. Bayer
  23. Celgene
  24. Cidara
  25. Cubist/Optimer
  26. Da Volterra
  27. Daiichi Sankyo
  28. F2G
  29. Genentech
  30. Genzyme
  31. Gilead
  32. GSK
  33. Medpace
  34. Merck Serono
  35. Miltenyi
  36. NanoMR
  37. Novartis
  38. Parexel
  39. Quintiles
  40. Rempex
  41. Sanofi Pasteur
  42. Shionogi
  43. Summit
  44. Vical
  45. Vifor
  46. Viropharma
  47. DaVolterra
  48. Berlin Chemie
  49. Merck/MSD
  50. Essex/Schering-Plough

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced anticancer efficacy of cyclophosphamide and platinum salts has been reported in animals treated with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics. These effects were related to translocation of Gram-positive bacteria during mucositis with subsequent induction of cytotoxic oxygen reactive species and tumor invasion by pathogenic Th17 cells. To assess these hypotheses in a clinical setting, we identified patients receiving cyclophosphamide for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and cisplatin for relapsed lymphoma. Data originated from the CLL8 trial (NCT00281918) and the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (NCT01821456). Relevant antibiotics were defined as compounds with primary activity against Gram-positive bacteria. We evaluated their impact on response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Among 800 available CLL patients, those receiving anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (n = 45/800) achieved a significantly lower overall response rate (OR 74.3% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.007). Patients with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics progressed significantly earlier, had a reduced OS (median PFS 14.1 vs. 44.1 mo, p < 0.001; median OS 56.1 vs. 91.7 mo, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis showed that administration of anti-Gram-positive antibiotic treatment was independently associated with reduced PFS (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.090, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 2.966, p < 0.001). Of 122 patients with relapsed lymphoma, those treated with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (n = 21/122) achieved a significantly lower OR rate (70.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.016). Patients with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics progressed significantly earlier than others (median PFS 2.3 vs. 11.5 mo, p = 0.001). As for multivariate analysis, the use of anti-Gram-positive antibiotics was independently associated with reduced PFS (HR 2.237, p = 0.012) and OS (HR 7.831, p < 0.001). Our data supports a potential negative impact of anti-Gram-positive antibiotics on the anticancer activity of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in a clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据