4.6 Article

Thermoelectric properties and low thermal conductivity of Zintl compound Yb10MnSb9

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 10, 期 28, 页码 15127-15135

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta03114k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1842165]
  2. NSF DMREF award [1729487]
  3. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [ECCS-2025633]
  4. Northwestern University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yb10MnSb9 is a thermoelectric material with ultralow thermal conductivity and a higher Seebeck coefficient. By optimizing the material, it has the potential to achieve high zT values, making it suitable for future thermoelectric studies.
The recently discovered Zintl compound Yb10MnSb9 is a thermoelectric material very close in compositional space to high performing thermoelectric materials such as Yb14MnSb11 and Yb21Mn4Sb18. Here we measure and report electronic and thermal transport data for Yb10MnSb9 up to 825 K. Due to the complicated crystal structure, this material has ultralow thermal conductivity. The ultralow lattice thermal conductivity in conjunction with a higher Seebeck coefficient than in other Yb-Mn-Sb compounds, leads to a moderate zT of about 0.34 at 825 K and is likely to peak at a higher value via material optimization. We approximate a bandgap of about 0.4 eV and expect the zT to be able to reach values as high as 0.33 at 725 K (which is comparable to Yb14MnSb11 at that temperature) using a thermoelectric quality factor analysis. This zT has the potential to reach even higher values by improving the quality factor, B, through grain boundary engineering. Here we provide suggestions for future studies to improve thermoelectric performance. This work is the first report of thermal conductivity, bandgap, and zT for this Yb10MnSb9 compound, and we discuss implications of this material for future thermoelectric study through comparisons to the leading Yb14MnSb11 material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据