4.5 Review

Meta-analysis of the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and prognosis of patients with stage I gastric cancer

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 101, 期 26, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029798

关键词

gastric cancer; lymphovascular invasion; meta-analysis; prognosis; Stage I

资金

  1. Major Project of Hubei Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission [WJ2017Z026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study using meta-analysis showed that lymphovascular invasion is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of stage I gastric cancer, and it is significantly associated with overall survival and relapse-free survival.
Lymphovascular invasion is considered to be a high-risk pathological feature after radical resection of gastric cancer, but the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and the prognosis of stage I gastric cancer is still controversial. Therefore, we used meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and the prognosis of stage I gastric cancer. Up to September 2, 2021, the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 researchers independently completed the screening of literature, extraction of data, and quality evaluation. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software merged with HR and 95%CI. A total of 7508 patients with stage I gastric cancer were included in 9 studies, and the positive rate of lymphovascular invasion was 17%. Lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (univariate: HR = 4.05, 95%CI: 1.91-8.58; multivariate: HR = 2.10, 95%CI: 1.37-3.22) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (univariate: HR = 4.79, 95%CI: 2.30-9.99; multiple: HR = 2.17, 95%CI: 1.56-3.00). This study indicates that lymphovascular invasion is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with stage I gastric cancer, and can be used as a reference index for postoperative adjuvant therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据