4.0 Article

EVALUATION OF SPATIAL PD1 AND PD-L1 EXPRESSION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE SAMPLES - A PILOT STUDY

期刊

POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 50-59

出版社

VESALIUS UNIV MEDICAL PUBL
DOI: 10.5114/PJP.2022.117178

关键词

PD1; PDL1; IBD; ulcerative colitis; Crohn?s disease

资金

  1. Medical University of Warsaw [1M15/NM3/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alterations of PD1/PD-L1 pathway may lead to an excessive inflammatory response in the intestinal wall in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in different compartments of the intestinal wall is heterogeneous and may depend on individual characteristics.
Alterations of PD1/PD-L1 pathway may be associated with an excessive inflammatory response in the intestinal wall in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). To evaluate the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in 4 compartments of intestinal wall (mucosa, submucosa, muscularis propria and lymphatic follicles), high-resolution immunohistochemically stained slides were obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of 10 Crohn???s disease (CD), 9 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 10 unaffected individuals cases. The levels of expression were quantified using the QuPath software. PD-1 was detected in lymphatic follicles in affected and unaffected tissue samples and in inflammatory infiltration in IBD. There was no difference between groups neither in PD-1 overall expression nor in individual compartments, with the exception of the mucosal expression. It was higher in the mucosa of CD patients comparing to controls, however this difference was marginal (p = 0.0461). PD-L1 was expressed in endothelium and mesenteric nervous plexi, consistently in each group. There were no significant differences in PD-L1 immunoreactivity in context of histologic compartment nor clinical diagnosis. The results suggest that PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in intestinal tissue is heterogeneous in the analysed groups, thus it may be dependent on individual characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据