4.7 Article

Synthesis of NiFeOx nanocatalysts from metal-organic precursors for the oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 30, 页码 11457-11466

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt01370c

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. Universite de Toulouse - Paul-Sabatier
  3. National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [103.992019.328]
  4. ANR [ANR-17-CE07-0022-01]
  5. Region Occitanie [ALDOCT000355]
  6. French embassy in Hanoi
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE07-0022] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the development of sustainable catalytic processes for the production of hydrogen from water. NiFe-based nanoparticles have been synthesized and characterized, showing promising performance in the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. The Ni2Fe1 nanocatalyst exhibits the lowest overpotential and excellent stability.
Production of hydrogen from a renewable source that is water requires the development of sustainable catalytic processes. This implies, among others, developing efficient catalytic materials from abundant and low-cost resources and investigating their performance, especially in the oxidation of water as this half-reaction is the bottleneck of the water splitting process. For this purpose, NiFe-based nanoparticles with sizes ca. 3-4 nm have been synthesized by an organometallic approach and characterized by complementary techniques (WAXS, TEM, STEM-HAADF, EDX, XPS, and ATR-FTIR). They display a Ni core and a mixed Ni-Fe oxide shell. Once deposited onto FTO electrodes, they have been assessed in the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions. Three different Ni/Fe ratios (2/1, 1/1 and 1/9) have been studied in comparison with their monometallic counterparts. The Ni2Fe1 nanocatalyst displayed the lowest overpotential (320 mV at j = 10 mA cm(-2)) as well as excellent stability over 16 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据