4.7 Review

Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764

关键词

Degrowth; Post-growth; Policies; Policy -making; Transition; Proposals

资金

  1. la Caixa Foundation [100010434]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UIDB/04085/2020]
  3. [LCF/BQ/DI20/11780027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degrowth, as a solution to the social-ecological crises, is slowly being recognized in policy-making. However, the scattered proposals in the literature make it difficult for decision-makers to understand the concrete changes associated with degrowth. To address this issue, a comprehensive degrowth policy agenda was systematically mapped out, consisting of 530 specific proposals divided into 13 policy themes. The precision, frequency, quality, and diversity of this agenda were assessed to understand the evolution of the degrowth policy toolbox until today.
Degrowth - the planned and democratic reduction of production and consumption as a solution to the social-ecological crises - is slowly making its way to the sphere of policy-making. But there is a problem: proposals are scattered through a voluminous literature, making it difficult for decision-makers to pinpoint the concrete changes associated with the idea of degrowth. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic mapping of the degrowth literature from 2005 to 2020 using the RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) methodology. Out of a total of 1166 texts (articles, books, book chapters, and student theses) referring to degrowth, we identified 446 that include specific policy proposals. This systematic counting of policies led to a grand total of 530 proposals (50 goals, 100 objectives, 380 instruments), which makes it the most exhaustive degrowth policy agenda ever presented. To render this toolbox more accessible, we divided it into in 13 policy themes - food, culture and education, energy and environment, governance and geopolitics, indicators, inequality, finance, production and consumption, science and technology, tourism, trade, urban planning, and work - systematically making the difference between goals, objectives, and instruments. Following this, we assess the precision, frequency, quality, and diversity of this agenda, reflecting on how the degrowth policy toolbox has been evolving until today.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据