4.1 Article

Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water

期刊

METHODSX
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653

关键词

Celite; Environmental water; Escherichia coli; Genomic and plasmid extraction; Guanidium thiocyanate; Membrane filtration

资金

  1. National Research Foundation [132727]
  2. University of Johannesburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To address the issue of culturing non-viable bacteria, DNA was extracted from concentrated bacterial cells in water samples for PCR analysis. An optimized DNA extraction method was developed and validated using environmental water samples with different bacterial loads.
To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as a foundation for extracting Escherichia coli DNA from water. The method combinations i.e., guanidium thiocyanate, celite and home-made spin column were chosen because it has been shown to be reliable, rapid, simple, and inexpensive for routine analysis in developing country settings. The following optimizations were included: (a) Polycarbonate (Poly) was statistically compared with Polyether sulphone (PES), Nitrocellulose acetate (NA) and Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes; (b) Various housing containers for the membranes were tested: plastic/glass petri-dish, Falcon tubes, Ogreiner cryovials; (c) various solutions was tested to add to the membrane to remove cells from membranes; (d) celite was chosen to bind the DNA because it had a higher DNA binding capacity compared to silicon dioxide; (e) incubation times and rotation speed were tested when adding reagents. The optimized in-house DNA extraction method was validated with environmental water samples, high (dam water) and low (borehole) bacterial load to determine upper and lower detection limits of the method. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据