4.2 Article

Seismic high-resolution processing method based on spectral simulation and total variation regularization constraints

期刊

APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 81-90

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11770-022-0927-5

关键词

high-resolution seismic processing; total variation regularization; spectral simulation; Hessian matrix

资金

  1. PetroChina Prospective, Basic, and Strategic Technology Research Project [2021DJ0606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is limited low-and-high frequency information in seismic data, resulting in lower seismic resolution. This study proposes a novel method to improve seismic resolution by using expected wavelet spectrum in the frequency domain and Frobenius vector regularization of the Hessian matrix in the time domain. It effectively improves the prediction accuracy of thin reservoirs and thin interbeds.
There is little low-and-high frequency information on seismic data in seismic exploration, resulting in narrower bandwidth and lower seismic resolution. It considerably restricts the prediction accuracy of thin reservoirs and thin interbeds. This study proposes a novel method to constrain improving seismic resolution in the time and frequency domain. The expected wavelet spectrum is used in the frequency domain to broaden the seismic spectrum range and increase the octave. In the time domain, the Frobenius vector regularization of the Hessian matrix is used to constrain the horizontal continuity of the seismic data. It effectively protects the signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data while the longitudinal seismic resolution is improved. This method is applied to actual post-stack seismic data and pre-stack gathers dividedly. Without abolishing the phase characteristics of the original seismic data, the time resolution is significantly improved, and the structural features are clearer. Compared with the traditional spectral simulation and deconvolution methods, the frequency distribution is more reasonable, and seismic data has higher resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据