4.7 Article

Diastereoselectively self-sorted low-symmetry binuclear metallomacrocycle and trinuclear metallocage

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 31, 页码 11650-11657

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt01571d

关键词

-

资金

  1. MoE (formerly MHRD), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A low-symmetry binuclear complex and an extremely rare trinuclear complex of palladium were synthesized through self-assembly reactions. The exclusive formation of specific isomers was predicted and confirmed experimentally. NMR study revealed conformational changes within the formed isomers.
A pyridine/aniline appended unsymmetrical bis-monodentate ligand N-(3-aminophenyl)nicotinamide, L-un is synthesized via condensation of nicotinic acid with excess m-phenylene diamine. A low-symmetry binuclear complex of the Pd2L ' L-2(2)un type and an extremely rare trinuclear complex of the Pd3L6un type are produced by self-assembly of the ligand L-un with cis-protected palladium(ii) (i.e., PdL ') and palladium(ii), respectively. Two isomers (i.e. [(2,0), (2,0)] and [(1,1), (1,1)]-forms) are theoretically possible for the Pd2L ' L-2(2)un-type complex whereas nine isomers can be envisaged in the case of the Pd3L6un-type arrangement. However, one of the isomers of the Pd2L ' L-2(2)un-type complex as well as the one for the Pd3L6un-type complex are experimentally obtained. The exclusive formation of specific isomers could be predicted from the 1D/2D NMR study in the solution state and the DFT calculations in the gas phase/implicit solvent media. The formation of the predicted all-(1,1)-[Pd-2(en)(2)L-2(un)](NO3)(4) has been confirmed by a single-crystal XRD study. DFT calculations for the isomers of the Pd3L6un-type arrangement show that a [cis(2,2), cis(2,2), cis(2,2)] isomer is energetically favourable than the alternatively predicted [trans(2,2), trans(2,2), trans(2,2)] isomer. Conformational changes within the build of the exclusively formed isomers are proposed on the basis of NMR study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据