4.5 Review

Antimicrobial mechanisms of biomaterials: from macro to nano

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 16, 页码 4392-4423

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2bm00472k

关键词

-

资金

  1. DST INSPIRE Fellowship [IF160513]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overcoming antibiotic resistance is a major challenge for scientists, and the development of next-generation antimicrobials is crucial in addressing emerging infectious diseases. Biomaterials have shown broad-spectrum biocidal activity against bacteria and viruses through various modes of interaction. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the diverse interactions between biomaterials and microorganisms, and explores how different biomaterials can modulate antimicrobial mechanisms for effective therapeutic outcomes without resistance development.
Overcoming the global concern of antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest challenges faced by scientists today, and the key to tackling this issue of emerging infectious diseases is the development of next-generation antimicrobials. The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant microbes, superbugs and mutated strains of viruses has fuelled the search for new and alternative antimicrobial agents with broad-spectrum biocidal activity. Biomaterials, ranging from macroscopic polymers, proteins, and peptides to nanoscale materials such as nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanosheets have emerged as effective antimicrobials. An extensive body of research has established the antibacterial and antiviral efficiencies of different types of biomaterials. What make these materials unique are the different modes through which they interact and exert their antimicrobial activity. This review provides a comprehensive and detailed overview of the diverse modes of interaction between biomaterials and bacteria and viruses, and sheds light on how different biomaterials influence and modulate antimicrobial mechanisms to achieve a high degree of therapeutic efficacy without resistance generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据