3.8 Article

Erector spinae plane catheter for pain management of multiple rib fractures: Anecdotal records of cases with blunt chest trauma

期刊

出版社

KARE PUBL
DOI: 10.14744/agri.2020.39327

关键词

Analgesia; nerve block; pain management; regional anesthesia; rib fractures; ultrasonography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-energy chest wall traumas often result in multiple rib fractures, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary morbidity in patients with multiple rib fractures is caused by impaired gas exchange in the damaged lung areas and compromised breathing mechanics due to severe pain. Therefore, adequate pain management is crucial in the management of rib fractures. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a newly developed technique that has been used in emergency departments for posterior rib fractures. This report presents anecdotal evidence of three patients with multiple rib fractures who benefited from ESP blocks.
High-energy chest wall traumas usually lead to multiple rib fractures associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary morbidity in patients with multiple rib fractures results from the impaired gas exchange from the pulmonary contusion areas and compromised breathing mechanics as a result of severe pain. Thus, analgesia plays a key role in the management of rib fractures. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a newly described technique and it has come into use in emergency departments for posterior rib fractures. ESP blocks can be administered in patients under anticoagulant therapy in the intensive care unit because the relevant area is located relatively superficial and far from the major vascular structures. In this report, anecdotal records of three patients with multiple rib fractures who had real benefits from ESP blocks are presented. This report highlights the bilateral extent of the sensory block after unilateral injection, the effect of ESP blocks on weaning from mechanical ventila-tion, and dramatic improvement in arterial blood gases analysis following ESP catheter insertion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据