4.0 Article

A Solvation Model for Performance Enhancement of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

期刊

FDMP-FLUID DYNAMICS & MATERIALS PROCESSING
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 1569-1579

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/fdmp.2022.022091

关键词

Mc-540-based dye; DFT method; electron injection; n-DSSCs

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2020-07016]
  2. Canada s Federal Funding Agency for University -Based Research and Student Training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the solubility model of Merocyanine-540 dye and the electron transfer kinetics of MC-540/TiO2 interface. By experiments and simulations, it is found that factors such as absorption peaks, electronic structure, and UV-Vis spectra in different solvents can affect the interface performance. The proposed Solvation Model (SM) is concluded to improve the performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.
A solubility model for Merocyanine-540 dye together with the interface's electron transfer kinetics of MC-540/TiO2 has been investigated (Merocyanine 540-based dye has been used effectively in dye-sensitized solar cells). The highest absorption peaks were recorded at 489 nm and 493 nm in Water and Ethanol solvent, vs. the vacuum phase which yielded 495 nm (associated with a modest electron injection-free energy value (Delta Ginj) of -2.34 eV for both Water and Ethanol solvents). The time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) method approach has been applied in this simulation. Additionally, the electronic structure and simulated UV-Vis spectra of the dye in different solvents have been determined, and the alignment with the solar spectrum has been discussed to a certain extent. The energy level diagrams and electron density of the primary molecular orbitals are shown, and the major issues that have an impact on our new interface's performance are examined. It is concluded that the proposed Solvation Model (SM) can improve the performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据