3.8 Review

Practical considerations for navigating the regulatory landscape of non-clinical studies for clinical translation of radiopharmaceuticals

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s41181-022-00168-x

关键词

Radiopharmaceuticals; Regulations; Non-clinical testing; IAEA; Clinical translation; Preclinical development

资金

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2180-390900677]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the considerations for non-clinical studies in the clinical translation of radiopharmaceuticals, including pharmacology, radiation exposure and effects, toxicology studies, pharmacokinetic modeling, imaging studies, and standardization of different clinical applications.
Background The development of radiopharmaceuticals requires extensive evaluation before they can be applied in a diagnostic or therapeutic setting in Nuclear Medicine. Chemical, radiochemical, and pharmaceutical parameters must be established and verified to ensure the quality of these novel products. Main body To provide supportive evidence for the expected human in vivo behaviour, particularly related to safety and efficacy, additional tests, often referred to as non-clinical or preclinical are mandatory. This document is an outcome of a Technical Meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency. It summarises the considerations necessary for non-clinical studies to accommodate the regulatory requirements for clinical translation of radiopharmaceuticals. These considerations include non-clinical pharmacology, radiation exposure and effects, toxicological studies, pharmacokinetic modelling, and imaging studies. Additionally, standardisation of different specific clinical applications is discussed. Conclusion This document is intended as a guide for radiopharmaceutical scientists, Nuclear Medicine specialists, and regulatory professionals to bring innovative diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals into the clinical evaluation process in a safe and effective way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据