4.5 Review

Approaches towards biomaterial-mediated gene editing for cancer immunotherapy

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 6675-6687

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2bm00806h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-1746891]
  2. NIH NCI [F31CA250367]
  3. NIH [R01EY031097, P41EB028239, R01CA228133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene therapies are revolutionizing the treatment of many human diseases, and it is important to consider both the delivery materials and cargos for maximum efficacy and safety. Non-viral delivery mechanisms and CRISPR technology have great potential in immune cell gene editing, but there are challenges that need to be overcome.
Gene therapies are transforming treatment modalities for many human diseases and disorders, including those in ophthalmology, oncology, and nephrology. To maximize the clinical efficacy and safety of these treatments, consideration of both delivery materials and cargos is critical. In consideration of the former, a large effort has been placed on transitioning away from potentially immunoreactive and toxic viral delivery mechanisms towards safer and highly tunable nonviral delivery mechanisms, including polymeric, lipid-based, and inorganic carriers. This change of paradigm does not come without obstacles, as efficient non-viral delivery is challenging, particularly to immune cells, and has yet to see clinical translation breakthroughs for gene editing. This mini-review describes notable examples of biomaterial-based gene delivery to immune cells, with emphasis on recent in vivo successes. In consideration of delivery cargos, clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR) technology is reviewed and its great promise in the field of immune cell gene editing is described. This mini-review describes how leading non-viral delivery materials and CRISPR technology can be integrated together to advance its clinical potential for therapeutic gene transfer to immune cells to treat cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据