4.6 Article

Integrating hollow spherical covalent organic frameworks on NH2-MIL-101(Fe) as high performance heterogeneous photocatalysts

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 3081-3093

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2en00393g

关键词

-

资金

  1. thirteenth postgraduate education innovation fund of Wuhan Institute of Technology [CX 2021338]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel metal-organic framework@covalent organic framework (MOF@COF) heterojunction was synthesized through post-synthetic covalent modification. The resulting heterojunction exhibited excellent photocatalytic performance under simulated sunlight, suggesting its significant potential for application.
A novel metal-organic framework@covalent organic framework (MOF@COF) heterojunction was synthesized based on post-synthetic covalent modification. In the present work, aldehyde-modified MOFs (NH2-MIL-101(Fe)) were covalently bonded with covalent organic frameworks (Schiff base network-1, SNW-1) forming the NH2-MIL-101(Fe)@SNW-1 (MS-x) heterojunction by using this strategy. The MS-x heterojunction showed excellent photodegradation ability for pollutants and photocatalytic hydrogen production under simulated sunlight. The superior photocatalytic performance of the MS-x heterojunction can be attributed to the formation of -C=N- bonds between NH2-MIL-101(Fe) and SNW-1, which enhances the charge separation efficiency and improves the stability of the photocatalyst. It is worth mentioning that SNW-1 on the surface of the catalyst had a hollow structure which can promote the photoelectric charge migration. Furthermore, the results verified that the matched band structure of NH2-MIL-101(Fe) and SNW-1 could induce a type II heterojunction, which could well explain the improved photocatalytic performance of the photocatalytic system. This work not only provides a new idea to construct highly efficient and stable MOF@COF heterojunctions but also broadens the applications of COF-based materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据