4.7 Article

Recovery of phosphorus from sewage sludge ash: Influence of chemical addition prior to incineration on ash mineralogy and related phosphorus and heavy metal extraction

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108117

关键词

Ash mineralogy; Chemical addition; Heavy metal extraction; Phosphorus extraction; Sewage sludge

资金

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO) (Belgium) [1S08418N - 1S08420N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of adding chemicals to sewage sludge prior to incineration on the ash mineralogy and the extraction of phosphorus (P) and heavy metals. Results show that adding chemicals changes the P mineralogy, but has little effect on P extraction efficiency. However, it significantly affects the extraction of heavy metals.
Sewage sludge ash (SSA) rich in phosphorus (P) is a promising alternative for non-renewable phosphate rock. However, wet chemical P extraction from SSA can co-extract considerable amounts of heavy metals depending on the type of extraction liquid used. In this study, addition of chemicals to sewage sludge (SS) prior to incineration was investigated for its influence on the ash mineralogy and related P and heavy metal extraction using sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid and oxalic acid. The additives selected consisted of Al, Ca, Fe, Mg and Na chlorides, sulfates and carbonates. Results showed that the addition of chemicals to SS prior to incineration changed the P mineralogy in the SSA, but this had generally almost no effect on the P extraction efficiency. The only exception was the addition of calcium chloride, sodium chloride or carbonates, which decreased the P extraction efficiency. Conversely, addition of chemicals to SS prior to incineration significantly affected the extraction of heavy metals from the SSA. Overall, the addition of aluminum chloride, iron(III) chloride, magnesium chloride or aluminum sulfate to SS prior to incineration offered the best trade-off between high P extraction and low heavy metal coextraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据