4.8 Article

An experimental and modeling study on the catalytic effects of select metals on the fast pyrolysis of hardwood and softwood lignin

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 16, 页码 6189-6199

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc04837f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naturally occurring alkali and alkaline earth metals have been found to play an important catalytic role in the pyrolysis of lignin. Experimental and computational modeling were used to compare the catalytic activity of ferrous iron to AAEM. The results show that ferrous iron is a stronger catalyst, while the activity order of AAEM cations varies in different lignins.
Naturally occurring alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEM) play an important catalytic role in the pyrolysis of lignin. Other metals also potentially play a role in the catalytic deconstruction of lignin but have only been qualitatively investigated. A combination of experiments and computational modeling were performed to explore the catalytic activity of ferrous iron in comparison to AAEM. Pyrolysis experiments with extracted lignin and density functional theory (DFT) calculations for model lignin dimers showed agreement between theory and experiment. Ferrous iron proved to be a stronger catalyst than either potassium or calcium. The activity order of the AAEM cations was less clear as model and experiments agreed for hardwood lignin but disagreed for softwood lignin. DFT predicted calcium to be a stronger catalyst than potassium for breaking beta-O-4 ether bonds while experiments indicated potassium to be more catalytically active as a result of higher turnover frequency. Pyrolysis of softwood lignin had a lower apparent activation energy (9.2 kcal mol(-1)) than for hardwood lignin (15.3 kcal mol(-1)). Of the catalysts tested only ferrous iron prevented the melting of lignin during pyrolysis due to its low apparent activation energy of 3.6 kcal mol(-1) and 8.6 kcal mol(-1) for softwood and hardwood lignin, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据