4.2 Article

Anomalous buoyancy of quantum bubbles in immiscible Bose mixtures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2123, 390837967, FOR 2247]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [897142]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [897142] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buoyancy is a well-known phenomenon in Bose-Einstein condensates, and quantum fluctuations can significantly alter the size and position of immiscible bubbles. In the case of a bubble condensate formed by miscible components, quantum fluctuations modify the equilibrium pressure that determines the bubble volume and change the criterion for buoyancy.
Buoyancy is a well-known effect in immiscible binary Bose-Einstein condensates. Depending on the differential confinement experienced by the two components, a bubble of one component sitting at the center of the other eventually floats to the surface, around which it spreads either totally or partially. We discuss how quantum fluctuations may significantly change the volume and position of immiscible bubbles. We consider the particular case of two miscible components, forming a pseudoscalar bubble condensate with enhanced quantum fluctuations (quantum bubble), immersed in a bath provided by a third component, with which they are immiscible. We show that in such a peculiar effective binary mixture, quantum fluctuations change the equilibrium of pressures that define the bubble volume and modify as well the criterion for buoyancy. Once buoyancy sets in, in contrast to the mean-field case, quantum fluctuations may place the bubble at an intermediate position between the center and the surface. At the surface, the quantum bubble may transition into a floating self-bound droplet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据