4.5 Review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: From infancy to ongoing maturity

期刊

JHEP REPORTS
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100498

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; HCC; radiation therapy; SBRT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma, including liver transplant, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma has been refined and adopted in recent years, but there is currently a lack of high-quality level I evidence supporting its use.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of liver tumours and is one of the leading causes of mortality. Cirrhosis due to viral hepatitis, alcohol or steatohepatitis is the major risk factor, while liver dysfunction due to cirrhosis is a deciding factor in its treatment. The treatment modalities for HCC include liver transplant, hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemo-embolisation, transarterial radioembolisation, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy. The role of radiation therapy has been refined with the increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Trials over the past two decades have shown the efficacy and safety of SBRT in recurrent and definitive HCC, leading to its acceptance and adoption in some more recent guidelines. However, high quality level I evidence supporting its use is currently lacking. Smaller randomised trials of external beam radiation therapy suggest high efficacy of radiation therapy compared to other treatments for patients with unresectable HCC, and phase III trials comparing SBRT with other modalities are ongoing. In this review, we discuss the rationale for SBRT in HCC and present evidence on its efficacy, associated toxicity, and technological advances. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据