4.6 Article

Accelerating the approach of dissipative quantum spin systems towards stationarity through global spin rotations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.012207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wissenschaftler-Ruckkehrprogramm GSO/CZS of the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
  2. German Scholars Organization e.V., through the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinsschaft [(DFG), German Research Foundation] [435696605, 449905436, FOR 5413/1, 465199066]
  3. Baden-Wurttemberg Stiftung [BWST_ISF2019-23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we consider open quantum systems governed by a time-independent Markovian Lindblad master equation, and demonstrate a phenomenon of accelerating the approach to stationarity by performing a unitary transformation.
We consider open quantum systems whose dynamics is governed by a time-independent Markovian Lindblad master equation. Such systems approach their stationary state on a timescale that is determined by the spectral gap of the generator of the master equation dynamics. In a recent paper [Carollo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060401 (2021)] it was shown that under certain circumstances it was possible to exponentially accelerate the approach to stationarity by performing a unitary transformation of the initial state. This phenomenon can be regarded as the quantum version of the so-called Mpemba effect. The transformation of the initial state removes its overlap with the dynamical mode of the open system dynamics that possesses the slowest decay rate and, thus, determines the spectral gap. Whereas this transformation can be exactly constructed in some cases, it is, in practice, challenging to implement. Here we show that even far simpler transformations constructed by a global unitary spin rotation allow to exponentially speed up relaxation. We demonstrate this using simple dissipative quantum spin systems, which are relevant for current quantum simulation and computation platforms based on trapped atoms and ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据