4.6 Article

Corner states in second-order two-dimensional topological photonic crystals with reversed materials

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.013510

关键词

-

资金

  1. Project of Zhenjiang Key Laboratory of Advanced Sensing Materials and Devices [SS2018001]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX22_3628]
  3. Practice and Innovation Training Project of College Students in Jiangsu University [202110299419X, 202110299423X]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a configuration beyond the 2D SSH model is proposed for investigating topological corner states in photonic crystals. The configuration features a simple structure, direct formation of photonic band gaps, and strong robustness of corner states against defects.
Recently, topological corner states have been extensively investigated in second-order topological photonic crystals (STPCs). However, most square lattice STPCs are proposed based on the two-dimensional (2D) Su-Schrieffer???Heeger (SSH) model. In this work, we propose a photonic crystal (PC) that goes beyond the 2D SSH model. The unit cell (UC) of the PC is only composed of a dielectric cylinder in an air back-ground (or an air hole in a dielectric slab). The topological trivial or nontrivial photonic band gap of the cylinder-in-air or hole-in-slab UC can be confirmed from the value of 2D polarization. Remarkably, photonic band gaps form directly without any intermediate transition. 2D bulk states, one-dimensional edge states, and zero-dimensional corner states are generated hierarchically in the box-type combination structures composed of trivial and nontrivial PCs. By comparing the perfect and defective structures, the corner states show strong robustness against the defects. The proposed configurations provide a simpler platform for exploring topolog-ical corner states in photonic systems, which have great potential for application in integrated nanophotonic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据