4.1 Article

Estimating forest attributes in airborne laser scanning based inventory using calibrated predictions from external models

期刊

SILVA FENNICA
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

FINNISH SOC FOREST SCIENCE-NATURAL RESOURCES INST FINLAND
DOI: 10.14214/sf.10695

关键词

area-based approach; calibration; forest inventory; LiDAR; spatial transferability; temporal transferability

类别

资金

  1. Norwegian Forestry Research and Development Fund
  2. Norwegian Forest Trust Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed and compared the performance of three different calibration approaches for externally predictive models in terms of time and space. The results showed that local calibration reduced prediction errors and approaches based on observed prediction errors on local field plots were better than using reparametrized models.
Forest management inventories assisted by airborne laser scanner data rely on predictive models traditionally constructed and applied based on data from the same area of interest. However, forest attributes can also be predicted using models constructed with data external to where the model is applied, both temporal and geographically. When external models are used, many factors influence the predictions??? accuracy and may cause systematic errors. In this study, volume, stem number, and dominant height were estimated using external model predictions calibrated using a reduced number of up-to-date local field plots or using predictions from reparametrized models. We assessed and compared the performance of three different calibration approaches for both temporally and spatially external models. Each of the three approaches was applied with different numbers of calibration plots in a simulation, and the accuracy was assessed using independent validation data. The primary findings were that local calibration reduced the relative mean differ-ence in 89% of the cases, and the relative root mean squared error in 56% of the cases. Differences between application of temporally or spatially external models were minor, and when the number of local plots was small, calibration approaches based on the observed prediction errors on the up-to-date local field plots were better than using the reparametrized models. The results showed that the estimates resulting from calibrating external models with 20 plots were at the same level of accuracy as those resulting from a new inventory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据