4.7 Article

Electrocatalytic and photocatalytic sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide to value-added chemicals: State-of-the-art progress, challenges, and future directions

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108219

关键词

Catalysts; CO 2 utilization; Electrocatalytic; Fuel; Photocatalytic

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2022M3J7A1062940]
  2. Korea Electric Power Corporation [R21XO01-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 conversion/utilization is a promising approach for mitigating global warming and meeting energy demands. Catalysts are required to accelerate the slow reduction process. Heterogeneously catalyzed CO2 reduction has been extensively studied, and this review summarizes the recent progress in electrocatalytic and photo driven CO2 conversion, as well as product selective catalysis. Challenges and future directions are also discussed.
CO2 conversion/utilization is a promising approach for accomplishing two objectives: using the single strategy of CO2 reduction to value-added chemicals and solar fuels to mitigate global warming and meeting the growing energy demands. CO2 reduction is kinetically and thermodynamically sluggish process; therefore, catalysts are always required for accelerating the reduction process. In the recent decades, the booming research studies on heterogeneously catalyzed CO2 reduction has sprung up. Therefore, a critical review on catalytic CO2 reduction and the recent progress in catalysts design is highly needed. This review presents a panorama of the recent progress in electrocatalytic, and photo driven CO2 conversion to value-added chemicals. Moreover, the recent research accomplishments in product selective catalysis are comprehensively reviewed. Lastly, a brief perspec-tive on the challenges and future directions is presented, which could be of great interest for enhancing the activity and selectivity of CO(2 )reduction reactions and commercialization of CO2 conversion approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据