3.8 Proceedings Paper

Theoretical Efficiency and Dosimetry of Buffered On-body Transmitter Antennas for Wireless Powering of In-body Devices

出版社

IEEE

关键词

bioelectronics; efficiency; exposure; implants; pacemakers; wireless power transfer

资金

  1. French region of Brittany through the SAD EM-NEURO project [227861]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the viable and safe application of wireless power transfer for bioelectronic implants. It analyzes the wave propagation in heterogeneous and dispersive media, electromagnetic exposure assessment, and optimum design of system parameters to achieve a trade-off between efficiency and specific absorption rate levels. Through a case study of a wirelessly charged deep-implanted pacemaker, the optimal configuration of transmitter dimensions and electromagnetic properties is determined. The study also compares this configuration to a magnetic counterpart to investigate suboptimal performance.
The viable and safe application of wireless power transfer for powering bioelectronic implants requires understanding the wave propagation in heterogeneous and dispersive media, the electromagnetic exposure assessment, and the optimum design of the system parameters to achieve a trade-off between efficiency and specific absorption rate levels. Therefore, based on the case study of a wirelessly charged deep-implanted pacemaker, a parametric analysis on the transmitter dimensions and electromagnetic properties is carried out to achieve such a trade-off. The results show that the system reaches the maximum efficiency without increasing SAR levels when the transmitter is composed of an electric source, an air-like substrate, and a superstrate matched to the wave impedance in the skin with a thickness of half the wavelength in this medium. Furthermore, this configuration is compared to a magnetic counterpart, and the reasons for its suboptimal performance are investigated in terms of near-field, reflection, and attenuation losses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据