3.9 Article

Rapid Detection of Cardiac Pathologies by Neural Networks Using ECG Signals (1D) and sECG Images (3D)

期刊

COMPUTATION
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/computation10070112

关键词

sECG images; LSTM; ResNet34; neural networks; MATLAB; Python

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Usually, cardiac pathologies are detected using one-dimensional electrocardiogram signals or two-dimensional images. sECG, a little-explored technique, can transform one-dimensional signals into three-dimensional signals for analysis using neural networks. This study developed two models based on LSTM and ResNet34 neural networks, achieving high accuracy, 98.71% and 93.64% respectively, and lays the foundation for developing Decision Support Software (DSS) based on machine learning models.
Usually, cardiac pathologies are detected using one-dimensional electrocardiogram signals or two-dimensional images. When working with electrocardiogram signals, they can be represented in the time and frequency domains (one-dimensional signals). However, this technique can present difficulties, such as the high cost of private health services or the time the public health system takes to refer the patient to a cardiologist. In addition, the variety of cardiac pathologies (more than 20 types) is a problem in diagnosing the disease. On the other hand, surface electrocardiography (sECG) is a little-explored technique for this diagnosis. sECGs are three-dimensional images (two dimensions in space and one in time). In this way, the signals were taken in one-dimensional format and analyzed using neural networks. Following the transformation of the one-dimensional signals to three-dimensional signals, they were analyzed in the same sense. For this research, two models based on LSTM and ResNet34 neural networks were developed, which showed high accuracy, 98.71% and 93.64%, respectively. This study aims to propose the basis for developing Decision Support Software (DSS) based on machine learning models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据