4.2 Article

Nanofocused x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L032012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research council [2018-07152]
  2. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems [2018-04969]
  3. Formas [2019-02496]
  4. Swedish National Research Council (Vetenskapsradet) [2019-06075, 2019-05542]
  5. Center of Molecular Water Science (CMWS) of DESY in an Early Science Project
  6. MaxWater initiative of the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  7. Wenner-Gren Foundations
  8. Swedish Research Council [2019-06075, 2019-05542] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates an experimental proof of concept for nanofocused x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy, using a novel event-based x-ray detector to capture nanoparticle structural dynamics with microsecond resolution. The research shows the impact of nanobeam size on small-angle scattering lineshape and diffusion coefficients obtained from nano-XPCS.
Here, we demonstrate an experimental proof of concept for nanofocused x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy, a technique sensitive to nanoscale fluctuations present in a broad range of systems. The experiment, performed at the NanoMAX beamline at MAX IV, uses a novel event-based x-ray detector to capture nanopar-ticle structural dynamics with microsecond resolution. By varying the nanobeam size from sigma = 88 nm to sigma = 2.5 mu m, we quantify the effect of the nanofocus on the small-angle scattering lineshape and on the diffusion coefficients obtained from nano-XPCS. We observe that the use of nanobeams leads to a multifold increase in speckle contrast, which greatly improves the experimental signal-to-noise ratio, quantified from the two-time intensity correlation functions. We conclude that it is possible to account for influence of the high beam divergence on the lineshape and measured dynamics by including a convolution with the nanobeam profile in the model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据