4.5 Article

Generation of an Adequate Perfusion Network within Dense Collagen Hydrogels Using Thermoplastic Polymers as Sacrificial Matrix to Promote Cell Viability

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9070313

关键词

thermoplastic polymers; HIPS; sacrificial matrix; perfusion; dense collagen hydrogel

资金

  1. Sorbonne Universite
  2. CNRS
  3. INSERM
  4. AFM-Telethon [22142]
  5. Ile-de-France Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel strategy was reported in this study to create a perfusion system within dense collagen hydrogels using 3D printed thermoplastic filaments. The perfusion network generated by the dissolution of sacrificial matrix did not alter the physical or chemical properties of the collagen hydrogel and was associated with increased fibroblast survival.
Dense collagen hydrogels are promising biomaterials for several tissue-engineering applications. They exhibit high mechanical properties, similar to physiological extracellular matrices, and do not shrink under cellular activity. However, they suffer from several drawbacks, such as weak nutrient and O-2 diffusion, impacting cell survival. Here, we report a novel strategy to create a perfusion system within dense and thick collagen hydrogels to promote cell viability. The 3D printing of a thermoplastic filament (high-impact polystyrene, HIPS) with a three-wave shape is used to produce an appropriate sacrificial matrix. The HIPS thermoplastic polymer allows for good shape fidelity of the filament and does not collapse under the mechanical load of the collagen solution. After the collagen gels around the filament and dissolves, a channel is generated, allowing for adequate and rapid hydrogel perfusion. The dissolution process does not alter the collagen hydrogel's physical or chemical properties, and the perfusion is associated with an increased fibroblast survival. Here, we report the novel utilization of thermoplastics to generate a perfusion network within biomimetic collagen hydrogels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据