4.6 Article

Robust magnetometry with single nitrogen-vacancy centers via two-step optimization

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.013107

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [765267, 820394]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shallow nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers are promising for high-precision sensing applications. To mitigate the negative effects of the complex environment, feedback-based quantum optimal control is applied, improving sensitivities and robustness through direct search and optimization of microwave pulses.
Shallow nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers are promising candidates for high-precision sensing applications; these defects, when positioned a few nanometers below the surface, provide an atomic-scale resolution along with substantial sensitivity. However, the dangling bonds and impurities on the diamond surface result in a complex environment which reduces the sensitivity and is unique to each shallow NV center. To avoid the environment's detrimental effect, we apply feedback-based quantum optimal control. We first show how a direct search can improve the initialization and readout process. In a second step, we optimize microwave pulses for pulsed optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) and Ramsey measurements. Throughout the sensitivity optimizations, we focus on robustness against errors in the control field amplitude. This feature not only protects the protocols' sensitivity from drifts but also enlarges the sensing volume. The resulting ODMR measurements produce sensitivities below 1 mu T Hz(-1/2) for an 83% decrease in control power, increasing the robustness by approximately one third. The optimized Ramsey measurements produce sensitivities below 100 nT Hz(-1/2) giving a twofold sensitivity improvement. Being on par with typical sensitivities obtained via single NV magnetometry, the complementing robustness of the presented optimization strategy may provide an advantage for other NV-based applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据