4.5 Article

Method for Determining Appropriate Clustering Criteria of Location-Sensing Data

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi5090151

关键词

clustering; LBSN; Twitter; MAUP; Moran's I; Topfer's radical law

资金

  1. National Spatial Information Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [15CHUD-C061156-05]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [61156] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20151813143] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large quantities of location-sensing data are generated from location-based social network services. These data are provided as point properties with location coordinates acquired from a global positioning system or Wi-Fi signal. To show the point data on multi-scale map services, the data should be represented by clusters following a grid-based clustering method, in which an appropriate grid size should be determined. Currently, there are no criteria for determining the proper grid size, and the modifiable areal unit problem has been formulated for the purpose of addressing this issue. The method proposed in this paper is applies a hexagonal grid to geotagged Twitter point data, considering the grid size in terms of both quantity and quality to minimize the limitations associated with the modifiable areal unit problem. Quantitatively, we reduced the original Twitter point data by an appropriate amount using Topfer's radical law. Qualitatively, we maintained the original distribution characteristics using Moran's I. Finally, we determined the appropriate sizes of clusters from zoom levels 9-13 by analyzing the distribution of data on the graphs. Based on the visualized clustering results, we confirm that the original distribution pattern is effectively maintained using the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据