4.2 Article

Fruit of Phyllanthus emblica L. suppresses macrophage foam-cell genesis and vascular lipid deposition using in vivo and in vitro models of early atherosclerosis development

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 317-+

出版社

JAPANESE SOC FOOD SCI & TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.3136/fstr.FSTR-D-22-00002

关键词

atherosclerosis; Ethnopharmacology; Cholesterol; Foam -cell; Macrophages

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2017BH053]
  2. Joint Research Fund for Young Doctors of Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) [2017BSH2017, 2017BSH2016]
  3. International Cooperation Fund of Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) [QLUTGJHZ2018002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phyllanthus emblica fruit may suppress atherosclerosis development by inhibiting macrophage recruitment and foam-cell genesis, reducing vascular cholesterol deposition.
Phyllanthus emblica L. has been used for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but its mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, fluorescence imaging in Zebrafish was used to screen phytomedicines for effects on atherosclerosis development in vivo. We found that an ethyl-acetate extract of P. emblica fruit (E-EA) proved highly effective for reducing vascular monocyte infiltration. The E-EA also reduced vascular cholesterol deposition in Zebrafish fed a high-fat diet. In vitro, E-EA suppressed the net deposition of cholesterol in macrophages in response to oxidized LDL. Suppression of macrophage foam-cell genesis resulted from substantial decrease in fluorescence-labelled-ox-LDL uptake as well as increased cholesterol efflux. Secretion of inflammatory cytokines from macrophages was also suppressed. QTOF-LC/MS revealed several unique compounds present in E-EA that have yet to be characterized for their anti -atherosclerosis effects. Our studies suggest that the fruit of P. emblica may suppress vascular lipid deposition by inhibiting macrophage recruitment and foam-cell genesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据