4.6 Article

Nonrelativistic axion electrodynamics in p plus is superconductors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014517

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDB28000000]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-18-1-2722]
  3. Stewart Blusson Quantum Matter Institute, University of British Columbia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In previous works, axion electrodynamics in three-dimensional p + is superconductors has been discussed based on superconducting Dirac systems. However, this present work, using a systematic path integral approach, shows that the axion electrodynamics in p + is superconductors exhibits a nonrelativistic form, different from the superconducting Dirac and Weyl systems. The implications of this nonrelativistic axion electrodynamics in relation to vortex lines and Witten effect are also discussed.
In previous works, axion electrodynamics in three-dimensional p + is superconductors is discussed by bor-rowing the results from superconducting Dirac systems. However, in this work, based on a systematic path integral approach, we show that the axion electrodynamics in p + is superconductors exhibits a nonrelativistic form, which is different from the superconducting Dirac and Weyl systems. More precisely, the induced electric field does not enter into the axion action, and gauge invariance is ensured by the combination of the electric potential and the Nambu-Goldstone phase mode. Furthermore, unlike the axion angle in the Dirac case which is equal to the difference between the superconducting phases on the two Fermi surfaces of different helicities, the axion angle in the present case contains an additional sinusoidal term. As applications of the derived nonrelativistic axion electrodynamics, physical effects related to vortex lines and Witten effect are discussed. Our work reveals the differences for axion electrodynamics between the relativistic and nonrelativistic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据