4.2 Article

Mechanism of Luminescent Chemosensor Response in Europium Chelates

期刊

OPTICS AND SPECTROSCOPY
卷 130, 期 3, 页码 214-218

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S0030400X22030122

关键词

europium(III); beta-diketonates; luminescence; ammonia; sensors

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-03-00409]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the chemosensor properties of Eu(III) carboxylatodibenzoylmethanates as applied to ammonia vapors. The experimental results showed that the luminescence intensity of Eu(III) increased linearly with increasing analyte concentration in the range of 3-300 ppm. The study demonstrated that the luminescent response was reversible and the ammonia detection limit was 3 ppm. Quantum-chemical modeling revealed that the optical effect mechanism involved the formation of a rigid H2O-NH3 structural fragment, which eliminated the quenching effect of high-frequency OH vibrations. The proposed chemosensors exhibited high sensitivity and selectivity, suggesting their potential use in food safety control and environmental monitoring for ammonia sensing applications.
The luminescent chemosensor properties of Eu(III) carboxylatodibenzoylmethanates with acetic and acrylic acids as applied to ammonia vapors are studied. Quantitative measurements of the optical response revealed a linear increase in the Eu(III) luminescence intensity with increasing analyte concentration in the range of 3-300 ppm. It is shown that the luminescent response is reversible; the ammonia detection limit is 3 ppm. The optical effect mechanism determined by quantum-chemical modeling consists in the interaction of ammonia with a sensor resulted in the formation of a rigid H2O-NH3 structural fragment, which eliminates the luminescence quenching effect of high-frequency OH vibrations. The chemosensors proposed have high sensitivity and selectivity and, hence, can be promising for creating ammonia sensors used in food safety control and environmental monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据