3.8 Proceedings Paper

Barriers to Transitioning Towards Smart Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_24

关键词

Smart circular economy; Sustainability; Digitalization; Change management; Barriers

资金

  1. Newton Mobility Grants 2019 [NMG\R1\191115]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2020/14462-0, 2019/23655-9]
  3. EPSRC Internet of Food Things Network Plus [EP/R045127/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper defines smart circular economy and identifies the main barriers that prevent companies from transitioning to it through a systematic literature review. The findings suggest that stakeholders, financial issues, and technological challenges are key factors that affect the transition process.
This paper defines smart circular economy as an industrial system that uses digital technologies to implement circular strategies such as reduce, reuse, remanufacturing and recycling. The smart circular economy has been regarded as a promising approach to enhance sustainability. However, barriers exist in various stages of the transition towards smart circular economy. This paper employs a systematic literature review to identify the main barriers that prevent companies from this transition. We adopt a change management perspective to study this transition and propose that it follows a classical three-step process of organizational change: unfreeze, move, and refreeze. We identified 24 barriers in five categories: finance, management, infrastructure, network, and technology. Then, we placed the barriers into the three steps to further investigate how they affect each stage of the transition. Our analysis suggests that: (a) stakeholders play a central role in the process; (b) companies often have financial issues in the early steps of change; (c) technological challenges emerge in the advanced steps. The findings can help diagnosecompanies' current status, identify solutions to tackle the barriers and predict future challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据