4.7 Article

Embedding silicon in biomass-derived porous carbon framework as high-performance anode of lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 918, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.165364

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Anode; Silicon; Grape stem; Porous carbon framework

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Projects of Sichuan Province [2019ZDZX0029]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a grape stem-derived porous carbon framework (PCF) was used as the matrix for silicon (Si) to address the issues of electrochemical activity and cycling stability. The PCF provided sufficient space for volumetric expansion of Si and abundant active sites, and its porous structure and high conductivity facilitated electrolyte penetration and electron transfer.
Silicon (Si) is regarded as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries because of its ultrahigh theoretical specific capacity, appropriate potential, and abundant resources. However, its inherent insulation and large volume changes lead to inferior electrochemical activity and unsatisfactory cycling stability, thus limiting its practical applications. In this study, a grape stem-derived porous carbon framework (PCF) with slender through-holes in the interior and a large number of micropores on the carbon walls was prepared via a facile approach and employed as the Si matrix. The continuous through-holes and well-distributed oxygen-containing functional groups of the PCF provided the Si nanoparticles with sufficient space to accommodate volumetric expansion and abundant active sites for adsorption. Additionally, the porous structure and high conductivity of the PCF facilitated electrolyte penetration and electron transfer. Therefore, the PCF/Si composite exhibited a decent discharge capacity (1006 mA h g(-1) at 0.2 A g(-1)) and robust cycling stability (891 mAh g(-1) remaining after 400 cycles). (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据