4.7 Review

High performance electrochemical capacitor materials focusing on nickel based materials

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 175-202

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5qi00187k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents of the University in China [NCET-13-0645]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21201010, 21173183, 51202106]
  3. Plan for Scientific Innovation Talent of Henan Province, Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province [14IRTSTHN004]
  4. Science AMP
  5. Technology Foundation of Henan Province [122102210253, 13A150019]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M521115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Of the two major capacitances contributing to electrochemical storage devices, pseudo-capacitance, which results from the reversible faradaic reactions, can be much higher than the electric double layer capacitance. Transition metal compounds are emerging electrode materials for pseudo-capacitors due to their multiple oxidation states and different ions. As one of the most well-known electroactive inorganic materials, nickel based materials are being developed for this purpose. Nickel based materials have been intensively investigated and evaluated as potential electrode materials for pseudo-capacitors due to their thermal stability and chemical stability, high theoretical specific capacity, low price and environment friendliness. A variety of synthetic methods such as hydrothermal/solvothermal methods, sol-gel, electro-deposition, and the spray deposition method have been successfully applied to prepare nickel based compounds and composite materials. In this review, comprehensive summaries and evaluations have been given to show the recent progress. And we introduce the nickel based compounds and composites electrode materials for supercapacitors via synthesis methods, the electrochemical performances of the electrode materials and the devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据