4.7 Article

Morphology-activity correlation in hydrogen evolution catalyzed by cobalt sulfides

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 279-285

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5qi00196j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Utah State University (USU)
  2. Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award (ORAU)
  3. Governor's Energy Leadership Scholars grant program of Utah Energy Research Triangle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transition metal chalcogenides such as cobalt sulfides (CoS) have recently attracted significant interest in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). In addition to the constituent elements and hence intrinsic activity, the morphology, porosity, and specific surface area of a nanostructured catalyst would substantially impact its overall electrocatalytic performance. In this paper, we report a facile and rapid two-step microwave-assisted anion-exchange route to prepare nanostructured CoS. By simply controlling the microwave sulfurization time, CoS of various morphologies such as hollow prisms, broken prisms, and nanoparticles could be obtained. Importantly, the correlation between morphology and HER activity of CoS in neutral water was systematically studied through a set of material characterization and electrochemical techniques. It's revealed that the morphology of CoS changed from hollow nanoprisms to 3D nanoparticles when increasing the microwave sulfurization time from 5 to 60 min. The results demonstrated that CoS with 3D nanoparticle morphology, prepared by microwave sulfurization of 30 min, possessed the largest specific surface area and electrochemically active surface area. These nanostructured features resulted in the promoted accessibility of active sites, enhanced mass/charge transport and easier release of hydrogen bubbles, rendering its highest HER activity and excellent stability and showing small overpotentials of 233, 314, and 364 mV to achieve current densities of 10, 50, and 100 mA cm(-2), respectively, in neutral water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据