3.8 Article

Adherence to an injury prevention program in male amateur football players is affected by players' age, experience and perceptions

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001328

关键词

Injury; Prevention; Football; Soccer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationships between player's characteristics and adherence, as well as player's perceptions and adherence to an implemented injury prevention programme. The results showed that older and more experienced football players had better adherence, and they considered the programme to be more useful, less intense, more functional, and less time-consuming. However, previous hamstring injuries, educational level, the programme's difficulty, and intention to continue the exercises were not significantly associated with adherence.
Objectives Adherence to injury prevention programmes in football remains low, which is thought to drastically reduce the effects of injury prevention programmes. Reasons why (medical) staff and players implement injury prevention programmes, have been investigated, but player's characteristics and perceptions about these programmes might influence their adherence. Therefore, this study investigated the relationships between player's characteristics and adherence and between player's perceptions and adherence following an implemented injury prevention programme. Methods Data from 98 of 221 football players from the intervention group of a cluster randomised controlled trial concerning hamstring injury prevention were analysed. Results Adherence was better among older and more experienced football players, and players considered the programme more useful, less intense, more functional and less time-consuming. Previous hamstring injuries, educational level, the programme's difficulty and intention to continue the exercises were not significantly associated with adherence. Conclusion These player's characteristics and perceptions should be considered when implementing injury prevention programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据