3.8 Proceedings Paper

Deep Learning-based Deformable Registration of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images of the Kidney

出版社

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2611768

关键词

deformable image registration; deep learning; convolutional neural network ( CNN); dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI; kidney

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01CA156775, R01CA204254, R01HL140325, R01CA154475, R21CA231911]
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP190588]
  3. Career Enhancement Program - UT Southwestern SPORE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Respiratory motion is a major source of error in quantitative analysis of MRI data. This study proposes a deep learning approach to correct motion effects and applies it to kidney MRI imaging applications.
Respiratory motion is a major contributor to bias in quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions. Deformable registration of three-dimensional (3D) dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data improves estimation of kidney kinetic parameters. In this study, we proposed a deep learning approach with two steps: a convolutional neural network (CNN) based affine registration network, followed by a U-Net trained for deformable registration between two MR images. The proposed registration method was applied successively across consecutive dynamic phases of the 3D DCE-MRI dataset to reduce motion effects in the different kidney compartments (i.e., cortex, medulla). Successful reduction in the motion effects caused by patient respiration during image acquisition allows for improved kinetic analysis of the kidney. Original and registered images were analyzed and compared using dynamic intensity curves of the kidney compartments, target registration error of anatomical markers, image subtraction, and simple visual assessment. The proposed deep learning-based approach to correct motion effects in abdominal 3D DCE-MRI data can be applied to various kidney MR imaging applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据