4.6 Article

Less is More: Lighter and Faster Deep Neural Architecture for Tomato Leaf Disease Classification

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 68868-68884

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187203

关键词

Diseases; Feature extraction; Computer architecture; Computational modeling; Viruses (medical); Transfer learning; Crops; CLAHE; data augmentation; lightweight architecture; MobileNetV2; transfer learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a lightweight transfer learning-based approach for detecting diseases from tomato leaves, which improves classification accuracy through techniques such as illumination correction and runtime augmentation, and is applicable to low-end devices.
To ensure global food security and the overall profit of stakeholders, the importance of correctly detecting and classifying plant diseases is paramount. In this connection, the emergence of deep learning-based image classification has introduced a substantial number of solutions. However, the applicability of these solutions in low-end devices requires fast, accurate, and computationally inexpensive systems. This work proposes a lightweight transfer learning-based approach for detecting diseases from tomato leaves. It utilizes an effective preprocessing method to enhance the leaf images with illumination correction for improved classification. Our system extracts features using a combined model consisting of a pretrained MobileNetV2 architecture and a classifier network for effective prediction. Traditional augmentation approaches are replaced by runtime augmentation to avoid data leakage and address the class imbalance issue. Evaluation on tomato leaf images from the PlantVillage dataset shows that the proposed architecture achieves 99.30% accuracy with a model size of 9.60MB and 4.87M floating-point operations, making it a suitable choice for low-end devices. Our codes and models are available at https://github.com/redwankarimsony/project-tomato.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据