4.1 Article

Prevalence of echocardiographic left atrial enlargement among hypertensive Nigerian subjects

期刊

AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 257-263

出版社

MAKERERE UNIV, COLL HEALTH SCIENCES,SCH MED
DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.29

关键词

Left atrial enlargement; hypertension; prevalence; Nigeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the epidemiologic pattern of left atrial enlargement (LAE) among hypertensive subjects in Nigeria and identifies the important correlates. Age, waist circumference, left ventricular wall dimension, and mass index were found to be significantly associated with LAE.
Background: Left atrial enlargement (LAE) predispose to arrhythmias, atrial thrombogenesis and cardioembol-ic stroke. Whether LAE constitute a major risk among African hypertensive subjects is not well described. This study was aimed to describe the epidemiologic pattern of LAE among hypertensive subjects and determine their correlates. Methods: Clinical and demographic details of 414 hypertensive subjects used were taken. Echocardiography was done. LAE was defined as Left atrial dimension (LAD ) 3.7 cm. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 17.0. Result: 414 subjects including 258 (62.3%) males were recruited. The mean age was 56.8??16.8 years. LAE was present in 57.73% of hypertensive subjects. Those with LAE were likely to be older (58.23??14.5 vs. 54.8 ??19.7 years, p<0.05), had a higher waist circumference (88.1 ??26.8 ??75.8 ??28.4 cm, p<0.05), left ventricular mass index (79.2 ?? 12.4 vs. 48.7 ??15.5g/m2.7 , p<0.05) and a higher frequency of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (65.3% vs. 40.0 %, p<0.05) respectively than those without LAE. LAD was significantly high- er among those with LVH than those without LVH (41.4 ??8.4 vs. 35.6 ??5.9 mm respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion: LAE is common among Nigerian hypertensive subjects. Age, waist circumference, left ventricular wall dimension and mass index are the important correlates of LAE in hypertensive Nigerians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据